Art-Language Vol. 3 No. 3: Difference between revisions
Appearance
imported>Dotclub No edit summary |
imported>Dotclub No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
!Title | !Title | ||
!pg. | !pg. | ||
!Notes | |||
|- | |- | ||
|‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’ | |‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’ | ||
|cover-1 | |cover-1 | ||
|<ref>Reprinted in Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology (ed. Alberro & Stimson)</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus | |Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus | ||
|5-11 | |5-11 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Bourgeois Revisionism, What? | |Bourgeois Revisionism, What? | ||
|12-23 | |12-23 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Conversation: Opacity? | |Conversation: Opacity? | ||
|24-26 | |24-26 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance | |Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance | ||
|27-28 | |27-28 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Now, naughty revisionism or no | |Now, naughty revisionism or no | ||
|29-33 | |29-33 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Denizens of class struggle | |Denizens of class struggle | ||
|34-38 | |34-38 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there | |How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there | ||
|39-42 | |39-42 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Jobless and Gaga | |Jobless and Gaga | ||
|43-47 | |43-47 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Community Arts | |Community Arts | ||
|48-52 | |48-52 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Abstract Art | |Abstract Art | ||
|53-65 | |53-65 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.) | |International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.) | ||
|66-72 | |66-72 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse... | |Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse... | ||
|73-75 | |73-75 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’ | |The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’ | ||
|76-84 | |76-84 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Shoot the Sodding Ref. | |Shoot the Sodding Ref. | ||
|85-92 | |85-92 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Provisions and Rules Again | |Provisions and Rules Again | ||
|93-98 | |93-98 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|More Unsightly Speculations | |More Unsightly Speculations | ||
|99-102 | |99-102 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee) | |Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee) | ||
|103-104 | |103-104 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society | |Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society | ||
|105-106 | |105-106 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank | |(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank | ||
|107-109 | |107-109 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|What’s an ideological boundary then? | |What’s an ideological boundary then? | ||
|110-114 | |110-114 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’? | |Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’? | ||
|115-119 | |115-119 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Who’s a little Max Stirner then? | |Who’s a little Max Stirner then? | ||
|120-121 | |120-121 | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down | |A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down | ||
|122-125 | |122-125 | ||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 02:02, 20 April 2023
Art-Language Vol. 3 No. 3 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Publication | Art-Language |
Date | June 1976 |
Volume | 3 |
Number | 3 |
Publisher | |
Editor | Michael Baldwin, Charles Harrison, Harold Hurrell |
Contents
Title | pg. | Notes |
---|---|---|
‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’ | cover-1 | [1] |
Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus | 5-11 | |
Bourgeois Revisionism, What? | 12-23 | |
Conversation: Opacity? | 24-26 | |
Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance | 27-28 | |
Now, naughty revisionism or no | 29-33 | |
Denizens of class struggle | 34-38 | |
How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there | 39-42 | |
Jobless and Gaga | 43-47 | |
Community Arts | 48-52 | |
Abstract Art | 53-65 | |
International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.) | 66-72 | |
Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse... | 73-75 | |
The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’ | 76-84 | |
Shoot the Sodding Ref. | 85-92 | |
Provisions and Rules Again | 93-98 | |
More Unsightly Speculations | 99-102 | |
Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee) | 103-104 | |
Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society | 105-106 | |
(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank | 107-109 | |
What’s an ideological boundary then? | 110-114 | |
Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’? | 115-119 | |
Who’s a little Max Stirner then? | 120-121 | |
A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down | 122-125 |
Background


References
- ↑ Reprinted in Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology (ed. Alberro & Stimson)