Art-Language Vol. 3 No. 3: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
!Title | !Title | ||
!pg. | !pg. | ||
!Reprinted in | !Reprinted in | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’'' | |''‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’'' | ||
|cover-1 | |cover-1 | ||
| | | | ||
* ''[[Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology]]'' (ed. Alberro & Stimson, 1999) | * ''[[Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology]]'' (ed. Alberro & Stimson, 1999) | ||
Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
|''Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus'' | |''Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus'' | ||
|5-11 | |5-11 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Bourgeois Revisionism, What?'' | |''Bourgeois Revisionism, What?'' | ||
|12-23 | |12-23 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Conversation: Opacity?'' | |''Conversation: Opacity?'' | ||
|24-26 | |24-26 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance'' | |''Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance'' | ||
|27-28 | |27-28 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Now, naughty revisionism or no'' | |''Now, naughty revisionism or no'' | ||
|29-33 | |29-33 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Denizens of class struggle'' | |''Denizens of class struggle'' | ||
|34-38 | |34-38 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there'' | |''How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there'' | ||
|39-42 | |39-42 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Jobless and Gaga'' | |''Jobless and Gaga'' | ||
|43-47 | |43-47 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Community Arts'' | |''Community Arts'' | ||
|48-52 | |48-52 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Abstract Art'' | |''Abstract Art'' | ||
|53-65 | |53-65 | ||
| | | | ||
* ''[[Art & Language 1975-78]]'' (1978) | * ''[[Art & Language 1975-78]]'' (1978) | ||
Line 75: | Line 63: | ||
|''International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.)'' | |''International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.)'' | ||
|66-72 | |66-72 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse...'' | |''Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse...'' | ||
|73-75 | |73-75 | ||
| | | | ||
* ''[[Art & Language 1975-78]]'' (1978) | * ''[[Art & Language 1975-78]]'' (1978) | ||
Line 86: | Line 72: | ||
|''The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’'' | |''The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’'' | ||
|76-84 | |76-84 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Shoot the Sodding Ref.'' | |''Shoot the Sodding Ref.'' | ||
|85-92 | |85-92 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Provisions and Rules Again'' | |''Provisions and Rules Again'' | ||
|93-98 | |93-98 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''More Unsightly Speculations'' | |''More Unsightly Speculations'' | ||
|99-102 | |99-102 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee)'' | |''Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee)'' | ||
|103-104 | |103-104 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society'' | |''Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society'' | ||
|105-106 | |105-106 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank'' | |''(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank'' | ||
|107-109 | |107-109 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''What’s an ideological boundary then?'' | |''What’s an ideological boundary then?'' | ||
|110-114 | |110-114 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’?'' | |''Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’?'' | ||
|115-119 | |115-119 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Who’s a little Max Stirner then?'' | |''Who’s a little Max Stirner then?'' | ||
|120-121 | |120-121 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down'' | |''A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down'' | ||
|122-125 | |122-125 | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 19:34, 8 October 2023
Art-Language Vol. 3 No. 3 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Publication | Art-Language |
Date | June 1976 |
Volume | 3 |
Number | 3 |
Publisher | |
Editor | Michael Baldwin, Charles Harrison, Harold Hurrell |
Contents
Title | pg. | Reprinted in |
---|---|---|
‘...The Timeless Lumpenness of a Radical Cultural Life...’ | cover-1 |
|
Transcript 3.1.76 Plus and Minus | 5-11 | |
Bourgeois Revisionism, What? | 12-23 | |
Conversation: Opacity? | 24-26 | |
Ideology does not penetrate class barriers as a transparent substance | 27-28 | |
Now, naughty revisionism or no | 29-33 | |
Denizens of class struggle | 34-38 | |
How to avoid assumptions that your good heart gets you there | 39-42 | |
Jobless and Gaga | 43-47 | |
Community Arts | 48-52 | |
Abstract Art | 53-65 |
|
International: England 1 (o.g.) USA 1 (o.g.) | 66-72 | |
Pastels in Prose – if not a Vignette in Verse... | 73-75 |
|
The problems of displaying base explicit directive ‘assumptions’ | 76-84 | |
Shoot the Sodding Ref. | 85-92 | |
Provisions and Rules Again | 93-98 | |
More Unsightly Speculations | 99-102 | |
Diagrammata or...In making Friends We Make Our Life (Arthur Mee) | 103-104 | |
Don’t Speak of Man’s Potentialities and their being made Actual in Society | 105-106 | |
(Education is not putting sight into blind eyes, so...) Back to the Sandbank | 107-109 | |
What’s an ideological boundary then? | 110-114 | |
Who said, ‘It is, on the contrary, the bureaucracy which brings the new mode of production into existence’? | 115-119 | |
Who’s a little Max Stirner then? | 120-121 | |
A tale in the sump oil: notes from under the car; you can’t help them breaking down | 122-125 |
Ephemera
-
Ad in The Fox 3
-
Postcard ad